Gagablog 45: Pope Gaga, "I don't need these 14k guns", No Nukes of Any Nationality

Some major worldwide news events happened last week and as usual I am writing the gagablog to show how they reveal magic and deepen our understanding of it and how looking to Lady Gaga as our Greatest Magician can show us the Escape Trick that gets us all out of these troubled times.
There are some interesting connections between the events in the news that occurred in the Valentine's week of 2013 but we might not see the connections if we don't look. It might take a little tying things together to actually make the connections but we have an endless supply of hair and wigs to tie with so let's give it a whirl.

The Pope quit last week and scientists discovered a snail that can detach its penis and grow another one. Snails are slow-moving, spineless, so slimy they leave trails, and they both are their own house and carry themselves/their house wherever they go so they can hide from the outside world. And in the same week, maybe the same day, that the first pope resigns in centuries scientists discover that snails can lose one dick and just grow another dick, a new dick, fully functioning but different from the last one. I have nothing against snails, really, I think they are a little gross personally but I love them as part of nature. I'm not trying to diss snails by comparing them to the Catholic Church but to show why it is bad that an organization of people shares these traits that we think of negatively. They aren't negative traits in a snail - it is good for snails to be slimy and slow and hide in their shells, and for some it comes in handy to re-grow a penis. Who knows why they misplace them or give them out in the first place but it's a snail thing. These are negative traits for an institution and it is obvious how this connection provides useful criticism. I made the connection because both events were reported in the same "main news" minutes of a BBC radio broadcast. The Church is too slow-moving, too tied to the past and conservatism (you can see how much of this is true for the conservative wings of all religions, so it is not just criticism of Catholics). When the world's attention and resources have been focused on ending the AIDS epidemic in Africa one man, the Pope, could have made a decision to "allow" condoms that would save millions of lives but he did not and his position on this issue ended up preventing others from providing condoms, including the American government under Bush who provided a lot of money to Africa to fight AIDS but did not provide condoms so that the policy would please conservatives and get their support, including the Pope. I suspect that ancient and false ideas about women and sex are the reason the Church is rotted with pedophilia, they are denying basic natural laws and taking unnatural and sick twists as a result. And the Church has long held vast stores of knowledge they keep secret but if they were shared they would probably force the Church itself to learn and grow or admit they already new better and live up to higher ideals and stop oppressing people based on gender and sexuality. And other people will grow and become their better selves when we have access to the secrets the Church has been holding. Jesus told them not to do this when he warned against the Pharisees who stood in the doorway and would not let anyone enter but also did not go in themselves to the storehouse of mysteries. This is the "slowness" of the Church and how it causes great wrong in our world. The corruption of a culture of pedophilia, and apparently financial indiscretions as well, have left a slimy trail of evil that the Church will not be able to avoid responsibility for even if it grows a new dick. The fact that they have avoided taking responsibility for so long, and ending the evils of pedophilia, even under the last Pope, shows how spineless they have become - again, good for a snail, but not for an institution. The Church has always been a House of People, like a house made out of people and of course Catholics have built some of the most beautiful houses of god in their magnificent cathedrals. But they have kept this all too insulated, too much to themselves and those who agree to do things their way, and the kind of House of God that the Church (and many churches) has become is not an Open House that grows to shelter the world as Jesus intended but has become more like living out of a suitcase or living in your car, where all around you is yours and has to be guarded from other people because it is all you have. This is snail living, again fine for snails but not for people, and most of us are guilty of it in some way, trying to protect what is ours. This is always ultimately a bad principle because we aren't snails we are people who always grow and build and make more, but it is especially a bad principle when it is on a bigger scale. We have countless examples, in every human field of endeavor, that show how people in power who ignore the needs of others and always protect "their own" will fail due to isolation and corruption. A snail goes slow and carries it's house so it can always retreat and escape the outside world. But that is not the intention of religion, to grow it's own way and remake the world to fit into it. Religion should meet people on their own terms and be open to adapting itself to meet their needs and circumstances. In order to keep things their way, to stay slow and show no backbone for change, the Church has jealously guarded it's House from the outside world's criticism and needs. This is why the best joke about the Pope resigning came from Dave Letterman. He said the Pope cited health problems in his resignation, specifically his neck was hurt from looking the other way so much. While the world is changing fast the Church's slowness is holding us all back.

 I guess I was glad to hear this Pope was leaving because I was disappointed that a conservative Pope was chosen in the first place, hoping the Church would go liberal instead because I thought that was what made Pope John Paul more popular, loosening up on some things - just an impression I had. But I was always scared of Pope Benedict so I was glad to see him going. For one, he looks like Emperor Palpatine. That can't be a good sign. But mainly it is for things that I heard on the radio when BBC interviewed people responding to the Pope's resignation. One man with an African said he was upset because the outgoing Pope had been so strong on issues important to them, especially abortion and homosexuality. I know that people in many different cultures and parts of the world are ignorant about the importance of equal rights for gay people and access to safe and legal abortions and I understand how cultural influences like the Church and other conservative religions keep people ignorant, but here in America where it has been such a debated issue it has become increasingly clear that the people opposed to these rights are the stupidest people we have. If we have any faith in humanity we should know that their influence is waning and that the future belongs to the mentality of the most rights for the most people possible instead of the mentality of restrictions. I was worried that the Pope was quitting just so he could influence the selection of his successor in order to pick another conservative Pope. In America electing a President for four years can also result in appointing Supreme Court justices for life so I was afraid resigning might play into Benedict's ploy to retain influence even longer with some sort of Darth. But he said he will not seek to influence the selection of the next Pope, and I appreciate this. I think that the scandal had caught up to the Church, and Benedict, and he recognized his role as a transitional Pope to kind of take the fall as all of this scandal came out. Hopefully the Church is looking to put those ways behind them, including the principles that led to those ways, and transform itself. Not to just say "it's over now that these guys are gone" because they were so associated with it, but to take a whole new direction and make sure that no sliminess remains is the reason they don't leave slimy trails, not because they got good at sweeping them away.

Some have speculated that the Church could elect a non-European Pope and thereby signify a new direction. A Pope from Africa might be the first black Pope in 1500 years but I know a lot of African cultures are conservative and have prejudice against gays and women. I feel like Latin American cultures may have less of that, or may be more open to the liberating messages of Christianity that ultimately overcome those prejudices since they have liberation theology in South America and widespread reverence for female deity in the Virgin Mary, even petitioning the Vatican to expand the Trinity to include Her in some parts of Latin America. I know similar beliefs can be found all over the world and they are the grains of truth hidden by a lot of patriarchal bullshit in many forms of Christianity and other religions, too, I surmise. There is an American Bishop from Boston who I have heard people say is considered for the next Pope, and I have no idea who he is or what his politics are but I hope that being from America would make him more liberal than other candidates or at least more open to changing his mind and accepting more liberal views while having the American influence to encourage that, as we are finally getting more things right in more places in this country. Whoever the next Pope is will be an improvement - not because Benedict was the worst ever but because some of these evils have been in the Church all along: repression of women, demonizing sex or saying it can't be just for fun. As someone who held strong to all these old ideas Benedict was slowing human progress. How much of a jump can we expect to make with a new Pope? I guess it depends on what "they" think we are ready for, so let me lay out some markers for them to consider  - please share this blog and your ideas about it.

The Pope got on Twitter, tweeting in Latin at first, which made the news and got some attention. But he quit a few weeks later, so while all progress is good if it is too slow, too little, it will look pathetic. If the Pope had stayed in office, maybe he could have "changed his mind" about some things, really had a turnaround, and made some drastic changes himself. Unfortunately, other conservative forces in power could have said he was getting too old and questioned his mind - since he is so old - if he started making really radical changes. On the other hand, had he not been selected, had they chosen a liberal Pope who then got the blame for the scandals, whether because he finally addressed them himself or it all just came out, his influence would be tainted by the scandal. It is more fitting that Benedict, who was involved in some of the pedophilia scandal, should be the one associated with it. I think of how I have longed for humanity to outgrow war and how I wished America would lead by example and dismantle the largest military on Earth. War seemed less and less "necessary" or even possible after the collapse of the Soviet Union but the Bushes made up reasons for it. While it is terrible that we did many of the things we did in the Bushes wars it is fitting, if we do finally transcend wars and these are the last ones, that they are associated with Republican, in other words warmongering, Presidents. It is a sharp lesson about what is wrong with that whole mentality. And it is terrible that so many people died to make such a hard lesson, and worse that we still haven't gotten it, but it is the same way with Pope Benedict condom-blocking Africa, it killed many people to show the world how bad it can be when we put the wrong people in power. If Benedict had changed his mind drastically it might have freaked people out. A new Pope will be best able to introduce new ideas and a new direction. I can't help but respect the Pope for recognizing this and knowing that it would be best to get out of the way and let a new Pope take over, maybe he even know how much change is needed and that he could not do it, and that the sooner and faster the changes can take place the better.

My suggestion is to make all the changes at once, do a complete 180, and get this thing on the right track with as many people working together for the common goal as possible, and of course I think this would best be possible by selecting Pope Gaga. Girl can tweet, if that is something they want the Pope to do. We know she can handle the hats. I know what the little monsters are saying "why would she step down to take that position? Why would a Goddess lower herself to be a Pope? And are you saying that she should stop being Lady Gaga???" My answer is that she would do it because we need help. Because meeting people halfway can be the best way to lift everybody up. And that it is not about Ego with Gaga, but about Love and helping people. And of course she would not stop being Lady Gaga, writing songs and performing as much as she wants to - she would just have to do the Pope thing on the side. And in order to get her they would probably have to change many of the Pope duties and expectations to accommodate her schedule, But it would all be worth it. There has not been a woman Pope in 200 years, and Pope Joan had to disguise herself as a man and they killed her when they found out. Selecting a girl Pope, by choice, could do a lot to make up for this evil act of the Church and also would start to turn around all the misogyny and repression of women throughout the Church's history. With Gaga in particular you could also go from demonizing sex to glorifying it, and glorifying femininity, masculinity, and our bodies and sexuality for their beauty in all their variety all at the same time. Gaga has not shown any desire to hoard money, so she could take what has apparently become a financial problem as the Church hoards vast wealth and turn it into a great asset, increasing charity to the whole world. She has done this already by using her celebrity to raise money for disaster victims all over the world. In the same way that she puts her own money into her tour she could use the Church's money to do its real work better, not to ensure that the Church stayed rich in gold but use it to better do the true work of the Church, not to serve itself but to serve other people. Gaga could pay restitution to help people whom priests have abused instead of paying for lawyers to fight this and most importantly could put an end to the culture that leads to sexually preying on children. Gaga would do this just because of her love for children. She expresses love and protection for children more than anyone I can think of since Jesus himself with her messages of love, hope, and empowerment to the youth of the world and even more specifically in her anti-bullying work and Born This Way Foundation. While Pope Gaga would do everything to help children worldwide for their own sake, to help protect them from war and disease and violence and poverty as well as from predators, the changes would take place throughout the whole system of the Church and we can see how it all went wrong in the first place. By allowing women to be priests, and allowing all priests to marry or be appropriately sexually active, you avoid that sick culture of pedophilia. By being open and honest and owning up to mistakes you can seek forgiveness and reach a new relationship with people you have hurt within the Church and also with people outside of it.  By looking towards the future instead of holding on to the past you seek to be the change that others need instead of trying to change others to suit your needs. I know it is "not possible" to elect Lady Gaga as the next Pope (I don't actually believe that I'm just saying it so you will keep reading) but whoever they elect will be more like Lady Gaga than Pope Benedict was so that is a step in the right direction. And I do think suggesting and holding her up as the best possible example sets the bar and shows what we should be going for and increases the chances of getting more of it in the next selection! Good luck to the cardinals who select the next Pope, may they be blessed with wisdom to help liberate the world from suffering, and if, as  late night comedians Craig Ferguson and Stephen Colbert suggest, they send up green smoke or it comes out of bongs in the top of the building, signifying that they have selected Pope Willie Nelson or Pope Snoop Doggy Lion (?), I would be happy about that, too.

But there is something ultimately important about getting the influence of real women in power. Gaga assures us she can be the queen, and I want to assure her that I will indeed love her when she rules the world and that even will make my infinite love for her increase somehow. Being Pope is not necessarily a step on her path to changing the whole world, she is doing a good job of that regardless, but it would be a sweet gesture and could help immensely and might be nice for her as well, a flowering of her Catholic roots. But mostly it would be good for the church to get over their fear of girls, gays, and sex in general, however they do this.

At the risk of writing the longest gagablog in a long line of long gagablogs, I have include some topics from last week in this edition because they all happened in the same week and because of the power in making the subtle connections between them. The analogy of the Pope resigning and the snail with a renewable penis is easy to see but if we can see the connections between a few other events of last week I truly believe we can use that insight and perspective to solve the most dire and dangerous problems in the world. These connections shed light on the most basic principles of happiness: love, respect, safety, making good decisions together and freedom from harsh judgement.

The event of last week that had a huge emotional impact on me, and I'm sure many Americans and some people around the world, was President Obama's State Of the Union Address. This was an amazing speech and I urge you to watch the video of it if you missed it. Most of the speech Obama is making very logical, decisive and forceful points about very important issues. I have to give him major props for saying we have to do something about climate change and really putting it in perspective and addressing this first after the "budget crisis" which everyone has decided must be issue # 1. Finally addressing climate change, the more and the sooner the better, can have profound effects on the entire future of human life on the planet, and Obama gave the issue more of the focus it deserves. Other issues as well were mentioned, but you can watch the speech and should to get the full scope of it, and at the end he takes an emotional turn to address the issue of gun control. In his impassioned refrain "they deserve a vote" he is driving home one of the most important principles of democracy. He had already made a point to end voter suppression with the example of the 102-year old lady who waited for hours to vote in Florida because of the voter suppression efforts of that state's Republican officials. But the principle behind "they deserve a vote" goes even deeper than the right to vote, which is supposed to be the bedrock of democracy. It is the very principle of conversation over conflict. The whole reason we want democracy is so we can all choose and decide instead of being forced by the powerful, that we can use our numbers to keep the more powerful people and institutions responsible to help everyone else. But in every situation, between individuals or groups or nations, even within oneself, there is the potential to move towards conflict or communication, they are opposite ends of the spectrum. We can learn more about each other or keep fearing and defending against each other. The more we learn about each other the more we realize we don't have to fear, so it is merely a tragedy and mistake, and the influence of some bad forces and power structures, that we have not already moved past violence entirely, as countries and as individuals. My friend made this comment: "That is what is wrong with America, even if we had self-driving cars there would still be people who just wanted to drive themselves, would insist on that 'right', even though they would be the only ones still causing accidents." I replied that that might be true but that in that situation those people would increasingly look like idiots and no one would want to be one of them, eventually, and driving your own car would not be a source of pride or masculinity substitute or whatever it is if there was just a safe, easier, universally accepted way. I think the debate about guns should turn out the same way. We should make laws and change our attitudes to end gun violence, but the social conscience needs to be engaged by public debate so we can really get ahead of the changes since the gun lobby will always be trying to hold us back. The difficulty of passing legislation can lay bear the evils and extent of big money lobbying in our political process, but we can also use Internet connectivity and social media to find ways to oppose pro-gun lobbying with lobbying of our own. The organization that we will need to defeat the gun lobby will pay off for other causes after the gun lobby is gone, too. But besides the issues around actually changing policy regarding guns, even if we could somehow never change a single law about guns, we can still end gun violence by changing people's attitudes.

People's attitudes can best be changed by communication. Conflict only makes people defensive and more entrenched in their attitude, but communication helps people see each other's perspectives and gives the chance to learn a better way than the one that has led them to conflict. People who are crazy about guns and refuse to consider any restrictions on them try to deflect the conversation by saying we should focus on the "mentally ill", though there are a couple of flaws with that. One is that while the gun lobby collects and spends a lot of money, I don't think they spend any of it to help mental illness and only talk about how important that is in order to try to not talk about gun control. The other flaw is even worse, that in my opinion even wanting a gun is often the sign of mental illness so we are right back to talking about gun ownership and not only the need for more laws restricting guns but also more scrutiny of the mentality that leads to wanting to own a gun, whether it be the desire to kill animals or to protect oneself or property with lethal force. I'm here to say that both of these things are insane, when we have grocery stores; skeet, cans, and video games to shoot; and other non-lethal options for protection. Its a definition of insanity to want to kill something when there is an option, so if that is a component of one's desire for a gun then their mental health is in question and they probably should not have one. The other reason many of these people claim to want gun rights is to protect themselves from an oppressive (elected) government. There are a couple of problems with this that makes it pretty insane in its own right. The first is that the government has such superior military prowess that the firepower these people are so fierce to protect is no defense against the military anyway - these people act like they are the Taliban but don't even have the same religious craziness, though they do seem just as religious about their own craziness. We call them "gun-nuts" for a reason. Some people complain that the media finds the craziest gun-nuts to make the whole movement look bad but the truth is they have to be a little crazy to want to have anything in common with those people and those people are themselves obviously crazy in a way that having guns has made even worse, maybe far worse. Indeed, like meth or crack can do, with as much certainty, guns make people crazy. Its just not really okay to have that personal power to kill. Oscar Pistorius was a hero to the world and is now a villain for killing his girlfriend and his best defense is that he thought he was shooting an intruder four times to kill him or her, with no warning through a door. Like that should be okay? I understand it might be legal in South Africa as it is in some states in America, but that is crazy, too, because no one's property is worth someone else's life. Pistorius does not have lower legs but he put on his prosthetic legs to shoot someone when, as an Olympic runner, he could have surely gotten away from the "intruder" by fleeing, instead. This is how gun ownership and permissive gun laws lead to craziness, that he thought he should kill someone for invading his house or that he thought his "right" to do that made it okay for him to kill his girlfriend and use that as an excuse, one that would "allow" him to do it because it would therefore be legal - but not right.

It just is not right to kill people. The reason gun-nuts don't want to have any real debate or vote on gun control is this principle, that is is wrong to kill, will eventually come out. You can only dance around it for so long. I agree that we need to talk about other issues as well that contribute to gun violence. If most people own guns for protection we need to look at two things. One is domestic violence and alcoholism, probably the greatest factors in gun murders amongst people who know each other, and addressing these includes addressing all sorts of issues about equality and better conditions and access for women as well as legalizing weed to replace alcohol as the most mainstream recreational drug. Another set of issues is poverty and police enforcement, since the main reason people feel they need to protect themselves from others is from robbery. When we have less poverty we will have less crime and when we have more responsible and effective policing we will have more cooperation and trust in the community and better response. But mostly we will have less crime to respond to when these social injustice issues are addressed. There are ways we need to rethink our whole image and attitudes about gender, masculinity and sexuality to remove the causes of rape and abuse before people have to use violence to protect themselves but we also need to reduce other crimes and improve relations with and quality of law enforcement so that when attacks and invasions do occur we can trust that good, trained people will quickly be there to deal with it. We can reach all of these goals, in addition to creating a new approach to mental health that is less stigmatizing and more helpful and actually helps the whole population not just the severely mentally ill.

There are all sorts of ways we can do things to reduce gun violence but we don't have to do every other one before we do anything about guns themselves. The gun-nuts will turn to anything to avoid discussing the actual principles behind gun ownership and Lady Gaga led them into a trap that could have completely defeated them but at least succeeded in revealing their tactics. A week or so after the mass killing of kids at the Sandy Hook elementary school Gaga wore her assault rifle bra at a performance in Canada. There were news stories the next day asking if it was poor taste or too soon for her to do this and many monsters responded that it was part of her art and a statement she had been making for years. I thought it was particularly meaningful at that time and I knew that Gaga was not using this image and creating this story unintentionally. I thought the conservative media and mindset especially fell for the trap when they expressed outrage and disgust for Gaga wearing this bra but they have not expressed the same outrage and disgust against actual guns, as if she was the Bad Guy, not themselves for protecting reckless gun craziness. They always say it is "too soon" to talk about gun control after every tragedy while they have increased to such regularity that there is never any "grace period" or recovery period from the trauma of these crimes anyway. They say it is "too soon" as if they are showing compassion for the victims but they are really only thinking of themselves because the victims and their families overwhelmingly want more protection from guns and gun-nut policies. The fact that they bother to complain about Gaga's assault rifle bra being "too soon" as well really reveals that they have no concern for victims or the community in general or actual issues but only are about their own feelings about stuff. They rightly don't want to have to address their feelings about gun control because if they did they would have to face the fact that they bear some of the blame for the tragedies that have been committed with guns for being so staunchly opposed to gun control all along. It makes them feel guilty and they don't want to talk about it, even when it is symbolized on Gaga's glorious body they want to say that she is wrong, but guns aren't wrong, which just shows how wrong they are. Her artistic message would have defeated them further had the conservative media fully taken the bait, though. If they had continued to make a story and issue out of Gaga's gun bra, as there is every reason to assume they would with their penchant for misogyny and distraction from real issues, then more and more people would eventually be exposed to Gaga's actual views on gun control and since she is so avidly against violence and guns she would have an even broader impact with her message. Most importantly the real agendas and attempts to avoid guilt of the conservatives and gun-nuts would come out even more in such a debate over Gaga's bra.

Gaga gets people to talk about all sorts of things, she has the artistic magical power to steer the world's imagination. She almost trapped the NRA into a direct confrontation in which she would have utterly defeated them and I think they backed down to wait for a fight they could win. But they are on the way out as people organize and express their views and also as we work to solve issues that make gun ownership feel less necessary to anyone until it becomes as archaic as it has always seemed to me and other non-violent, future-thinking people. Love overcomes all and the reason we ever think we need or resort to violence is because we are afraid to understand someone else. Gaga expresses love for everyone and acceptance of the hurt child within everyone so we can cast off the gross forms of adults we have become that grew out of fear of lost love and for too many into fear of other people. I loved Obama's refrain that "they deserve a vote" because it affirmed the decency of people and of democracy, that if we come together with respect we can surely find ways to live with less violence and ultimately in peace with no violence at all. This calls up the very question of why we feel like we need any weapons. The answer is to defend ourselves against an "other" but when we think about why that is better than trying to understand the "other" or change the conditions that have led to conflict there really is no excuse. We are in a terrible state when we would rather kill people than hear their point of view and try to meet their needs but this is an attitude that pervades all levels of society. I was so proud of Obama for all of the points he made about equal rights for women and gay people, for voter rights and to protect the planet, it all had the strong message that we will do the best when we respect each other the most and work with the most respect for the environment, too. Obama's foreign policy has always seemed to seek making friends instead of enemies, even making friends with former enemies, around the world and working towards mutual peace and security. The "hot spots" of concern have been the North Korean and Iranian nuclear programs. I appreciate Obama's wisdom to not rush into war with either of the countries and we should be proud for re-electing him just for avoiding immediate war if we had chosen otherwise. Personally I think the best approach to avoid the threat of nuclear attack and avoid all such threats in the future is a little more radically different, though. I think Obama knows on principle that if we talk more about guns we will get a better society with less killings, he knows we will do the right thing. He knows if we talk about violence in general we will have less violence, he trusts that we will come up with solutions that don't require violence. I think that is the basis for the wisdom to never rush to war, but as good as that is in comparison to warmongering I think we need to go further and enthusiastically seek peace.

I have said in previous gagablogs that the best way to disarm someone is not to yell "drop your gun!"at him forcefully and hope he accepts that you are the better shot. A better way would be to lay down your own gun and say "you don't need a gun, I'm not a threat to you." I know this would not be strictly the case in our society where many people are somewhat or a lot maddened by gun craziness but the principle is sound and if we could work toward that principle I think we would see the truth of this more often. The best way to say "you don't need a gun" is to say "I don't need a gun"  - I'm assuming we can work this out without violence. Dr. Who said he never carries a weapon because that implies he expects to need to use one. More than just manifesting bad things in a magical sense, being armed or aggressive changes the way people respond to you and can create a bad situation from nothing. In the case of not needing a gun to protect oneself from a threat, we would like to feel secure that we don't need our own guns because the police are fast enough and well-trained enough to deal with any potential threat better and there are ways we can realize that. If police were the ones expected to use guns to protect others and no one else felt they had to take on this burden that would be an improvement but an even further improvement would be if our law enforcement was done with purely non-lethal force and the same training was used to make that the best response possible to criminals and crazy people alike. We surely have the technology to make new non-lethal methods to detain people if we got off the gun-craziness and focused some resources on developing them. I'll never forget the cop who pulled up when I was stuck with other drivers as a small tree had fallen across the on-ramp. He got out, looked at it, and his first idea was "I might be able to shoot through it." We all tried to push it aside and could not but a minute later a pick-up truck with construction workers in the back pulled up and they all pushed it out of the way. We don't really need guns for anything anymore and the only reason we still have them is a bad habit and being stuck in that mentality. The same is true for nuclear weapons  - they aren't good for anything, and the principle that they are good for threatening other countries to not have them is not sound, as more countries get nuclear weapons and for the most part seem to gain more respect and power when they do. But this is a false power and the stronger principle, that is true and will ultimately win, is that the best way to tell someone they don't need nuclear weapons is to show them "look, we don't need nuclear weapons."

This is based on the very fundamental principle of communication versus conflict and communication triumphing over conflict. All we are saying when we are saying give peace a chance, all we want when we advocate disarmament, is less weapons, less violence. It is not the right approach to pressure North Korea or Iran to not seek a nuclear weapon. Sanctions will only make their people feel more dependence on their governments and threats, rhetorical or military, will only lead them to feel persecuted and justified to respond with violent means or capabilities. We need to coax them to not seek nuclear weapons. We need to coax other countries into giving them up, including ourselves. As the country with by far the most nuclear weapons, as the only country to ever use them, we should lead by example and say "look, we made a mistake, a lot of mistakes, and we don't really need nuclear weapons. No one does." And we could lead by example by disarming, enthusiastically. I was at a training for work recently where the trainer presented ideas from the Love and Logic Institute that I thought were really good. He asked at one point if it was possible to be loving and strong at the same time and I thought that the strongest thing is love so it is not possible to be ultimately one without also being ultimately the other. While bombs and weapons might be the strongest things in one sense they are not loving and the stronger thing than having weapons is finding a way to get rid of them, to get rid of the weapons and the conditions that lead to any feeling that we need weapons.

We basically just need to get over our fears of one another and one reason I love Gaga so much is because she encourages us to really be ourselves, our best selves and our dream selves and to transform ourselves to become better all the time. We don't need to hold on to rigid ideas, about ourselves or about other people. We can find that there is nothing to be afraid about "other" people, that all of our fears have really only been kept in place so that we don't have to learn about each other but once we do we are of course much happier. We have demonized other people, and religions and politics have done some of the worst of this, but once we see beyond labels and prejudices we feel our commonality with our fellow humans. The world is becoming so interconnected that this is bound to improve things with the only thing holding us back being the old mentality of feeling like there is a need for war or defense against others instead of just realizing that if other people have problems we should do what we can to help them. We have to overcome old ideas of ourselves and find new identities that share the concerns of the people we are just becoming more familiar with. I think of how much the American media and politics demonized the Russian people throughout the Cold War but how now we have increasingly better understanding and relations between our citizenry, and how foolish and typical it was for conservative Mitt Romney to try to revive anti-Russian sentiment or ratchet up angst against China. We don't need some "1984" reality where we move from one perceived enemy to another. We can remember how these prejudices are manufactured and learn from that to dismantle the rest of them and prevent more from being made. Conversation instead of conflict is the key. Conversation is based on the idea of respect for the other person - I might not understand you but I am trying to. The reason it is best to be as Loving and as Strong as possible is that it takes that focus to overcome our concern for ourselves in order to understand someone else. We need to get over our posturing to defend our own interests most and really see the other point of view. My training regarded dealing with traumatized children but the same approaches would be best to deal with the negative actions of countries. "Acting out", seeking nuclear weapons, is essentially either a play for control through negative power or a reaction to a feeling of being threatened by the negative power of another. By exerting negative power ourselves, having a nuclear weapons ourselves or imposing of sanctions to punish a country seeking nuclear weapons, we only make the situation worse, making them even more isolated and desperate, further traumatizing them. We say we want to do anything to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon but we consider the drastic, strong action to be a military strike while the actual strongest response, and most effective, is setting the example of disarmament and unconditional love and humanitarian support for all suffering people so citizens of oppressive regimes that want to make them more militaristic will realize that is not their best interest. I heard rumors in the 1990's that we had given Israel 75 nuclear weapons and we have probably given them more since then, but we are outraged that Iran would have one, recognizing Israel and Iran as the major opposing powers in the region. Of course one nuclear weapon is too much, but why is 75 or more, or the thousands America still has, okay? The implication is that some people can be trusted with nuclear weapons and that others cannot, that there is some fundamental difference between people in this way and this attitude does not lead to conversation. It is just conflict until we can truly put aside preference for our own self-interest and seek common good. Maybe no one can really be trusted with nuclear weapons, or guns, maybe almost everyone could be, but if all weapons are actually unnecessary then it does not really matter. Since threats are not the way to get compliance, but leading by example and enticing with better ideas is, we should disarm and work to reduce the military as soon as possible, putting that focus and resources towards building cooperation around the world. Our new Secretary of State John Kerry recently said that our most pressing foreign policy concern is actually our own internal budget debate gridlock because we need to set a good example to other countries of being fiscally responsible. The same principle is true for nuclear weapons, as it is true for personal gun ownership. We need to reduce people feelings of fear and threats, we need to get people out of the idea that they need weapons, at every level and all over the world.

We need to take Gaga's advice and transform ourselves and our ideas of each other so we can live without fear, and we need to live up to her example that "I don't need these 14 karat guns to win I'm a woman I insist it's my life". This is a message to the greedy and gun-nuts alike - you don't need money to be happy, money is best used to increase love - not to hold one's treasure for "your own kind" but to share it to help everyone, and you don't need weapons to ensure survival or success, because it is a basic right of existence. She is insisting on being treated with respect, as a woman, and therefore calls into question the many systems that deny equal respect to women but also calls on the principle that she has the right to determine her own life as an individual woman and she expects that right to be honored for her in the same way that she will respect that for others, men and women. This is the most basic principle at work, because it might not be like this yet - which is the reason she has to insist upon it and make this come true  - but it is the way it should be and it is the way it will be. The whole principle of expecting others to respect our life and liberty is to respect theirs as well, it is an agreement between people. But we short-circuit this agreement when we demonize others, when we say that they are not as valid, that their interests are not as important and force a conflict between us instead of seeking to communicate and work together. If we can recreate ourselves and look beyond fear to see each other equally, as Gaga recommends, we can move past all of these conceptions between people that can allow conflict or people to kill each other, whether it is Americans and other countries nuking each other or people arming themselves against criminals or insane people - we still need to find ways to help, not kill, each other. People think they need the "strength" of weapons to "win" a potential conflict but the real strength, and the real victory, is in avoiding conflict and the greatest strength is in changing the conditions that could lead to conflict, to stop it all before it happens. And the best way to do this is remember that it is not about "us", to get over ourselves, to move beyond our ideas of who we are and who we "can't" relate to, and to see everyone as "us" and even to see other's concerns before our own, or strive to since the ego demands that we think first of ourselves. This is what we need to have the greatest strength for, to overcome the force of our own wills, and work for common good, to put aside our egos which are the greatest threats to peace and security, not some outside threats. Because solving problem by working beyond our egos, seeking to help others first, is what will ultimately remove all causes for conflict and violence in the first place.

Gaga reminds us that the real way to win is assertion of equal rights, not the use of force. This fosters communication, not conflict. And we need to be able to move beyond the wrongs we have done to each other and ourselves, or imagine we will do, in order to reach forgiveness and move forward. I've been reading a book on Advaita philosophy by Dennis Waite called "The Book of One" and in order to illustrate a point about different qualities, gunas, that affect all actions and all existence he retells a story told by Ramakrishna (p. 81) about a man attacked by 3 thieves in a forest. The first thief says they should kill them after they rob him and the second convinces them to just tie him up. The third thief returns and unties the man and helps him on his way back to his village. At the edge of the forest the man invited the thief to return with him to his home but the thief is embarrassed for being a thief and goes back to his life in the forest. The story was used to tell how we are all limited or conditioned by our own measure of these different qualities in our lives but to me it also has a message about getting over our ideas of ourselves and seeking and accepting forgiveness. The thief could have changed his ways if he had shed his image of himself and ceased identifying as a thief, and the forgiveness of the robbed man makes this possible. That is what we need in our attitude towards dealing with "dangerous" people: we should not seek to kill them first but should seek to help them. We can do this by relieving the wrong we have endured by forgiving the offender and accepting that there is a deeper connection between us as equals, that even if someone has threatened us by breaking into our house or making a tiny percentage of the weapons we have we should try to help them see that this is not the right way and we can do this by setting a more positive example, showing that we truly want to respect everyone equally. The ego's insistence on preference for ourselves can be overcome with the greatest strength, Love, and once we start acting more out of love for each other it will keep getting easier, we will understand each other and meet each other's needs and concerns better, and there will be less threats and dangerous people all around. We need to all realize that we "don't need these 14 karat guns" and move past those ways of thinking, that we need money to be happy or weapons to protect ourselves. We should live up to our potential, we are smart enough to solve conflicts without violence so we should insist on this and develop the ways to ensure we do it.

Both of the major issues of last week, the change to a Pope who will be more responsive both to the actual needs of the billion people in the Church and to the other six sevenths of the world's population, and the change from an attitude where we need weapons to one where we do not, involve the same basic principle: putting yourself and preference for "your own kind" aside and realizing that we are all in it together and are really all the same, with equal rights and aspirations to happiness. We are finally realizing these principles in order to address gun violence and many other issues in our society. Even to discuss some issues and make any progress at all we need to be able to get over ourselves and our own perspectives enough to compromise and advance. We can all make changes in ourselves to become better and a new era is beginning where those changes will be more widespread and easier to realize with growing support from others. I think the fastest way would be made by selecting Gaga as the new Pope but since this probably won't happen I think even imagining it and the good it represents, advocating for it in the world of discussion, on the Internet, will have a positive effect. This is just an example of how communication wins and defeats conflict, and the best communication comes when we get over ourselves to try to fully appreciate and understand the needs of others. Lady Gaga as a performer and artist and Mother to her family of little monsters has always encouraged people to reinvent themselves as the best they can be. The idea of Pope Gaga is useful to reveal the dangers of clinging rigidly to tradition and the benefits of making radical change, of catching up with the ever changing world and its needs. The goal of non-violence and getting rid of weapons is also a part of realizing the peaceful future we all deserve and should be seeking. Gaga shows us the way clearly, and if our leaders can use the same insight that hopefully will lead us away from selfish violence as individuals maybe they will also learn the lessons of their own advice and really work for peace worldwide. We have to lead by example, showing that the greatest strength is in our love for one another and the power of the truth of our ideals of equality. We set the best example by being the strongest one who walks way from weapons and violence, the one who vows not to hurt but to see those who are hurting as an opportunity to help and committing to trying to help everyone and never writing anyone off as someone who deserves negativity. This means even if we don't understand someone or fear them we don't demonize them or decide there is a reason to justify killing them. In fact, not understanding someone can lead to conflict but should be our sign to communicate instead, to overcome our fears and the limitations of our identities and learn about the other and how we are really the same in order to find ways to work together for common goals.

If we keep in mind that basic respect for each other is of utmost importance we can work through any differences or conflicts without violence. It's only rigid ideas of ourselves and the way things should be that keep us in opposition and ignorance of each other that can lead to conflict. We can follow Gaga's example, and our own insight, to know that we are right to expect respect for ourselves just as individuals, as men and women and girls and boys, and that it is based on having the same respect for every other person on the planet, not on an ability to kill them We should seek strangeness and "otherness" as a chance to grow together, to investigate and learn and find new ways to meet the needs of all of humanity.

Gagablog 44 for Obama 44: Election Day, The Future Begins, World Peace

My Gagablog has been suspended as I awaited a resolution to the conflict in Syria which tragically still continues. I can't explain exactly how I expected the magic to work, except that I did because for me Gaga reveals a Divine Liberation that is destined to free the whole world. I was hoping that drawing attention to that magical connection would cause something miraculous to happen to end the violence in Syria - to end conflict everywhere eventually - but first in the places where it is most atrocious.
Gaga has been busy all these last months, relentlessly touring the whole world, and she has been doing a lot. She continues to work her magic in her performance and in her interactions with her little monsters and social movements she creates and inspires, including the launching of the Born This Way Foundation. Her show and message has caused controversy in a few countries where she has been accused of spreading homosexuality, highlighting those cultures' homophobia and bringing out voices of little monsters within them to speak up. Most recently she has put out pictures of herself smoking joints and tweeted about a new song she is writing about cannabis - to me this fulfils something I have been prophecying about, that after using her powers to help liberate gay people from oppression she will help liberate potsmokers, too. Americans who enjoy the herb are subject to a lot of persecution and risk imprisonment under the old laws we have, but we are changing these.
The reason I am writing the Gagablog again is because I know something more needs to be done, there is still a crisis in Syria almost 2 years later and the Syrian government has killed tens of thousands of people. There has also been a sort of crisis in America in the last few months as, against all decency and common sense, Mitt Romney has appeared to have a chance to win or more likely steal the 2012 election. I don't even want to imagine how horrible that would be, though we got a taste of it from the scare of thinking he would win and we would lose many protections, services and rights. The right-wing social agenda is so scary and evil that we have not even discussed their foreign policy, but it is no coincidence that when America elects Republicans we go to war and the rhetoric from Romney and McCain and other right-wingers shows that we would go to war in Syria if we elected him. More accurately, we would go to war with Iran and Russia IN Syria - at least that is where it would start, but electring Romney is a vote for World War 3.
A vote for Obama is a vote for World Peace, and world peace will win. Yes, I have the Vegas oddmakers and some prominent statistician/journalist, Mr. Silver, backing me up with a 90% odds that Obama will win, but of course the media is portraying it as "too close to call" and "razor tight" (to Colbert's delight) and it scares me that they can even report this because if we believe it is that close we won't question the results if the Republicans steal it. But the reason I am saying today that Obama will win - and hopefully we will know for sure tonight - is that he has to win, humanity must continue. And I believe the stakes are that high. Of course the stakes in Syria are high as well, as more and more innocent people are killed everyday. I don't know if Gaga has made any statement about Syria, I just Googled "gaga syria" and the closest thing I saw was my own gagablog and a video on youtube asking Gaga to sing for the Syrian revolution - so the connection is there in the world, I am not the only one hoping for her liberating magic to help them.
And she is helping them, indirectly but significantly. Because unfortunately one reason America has not been able to play a major role in ending the violence in Syria is because of the Presidential election and the fear that actions Obama could take could be used against him in the campaign. It is too bad that we can't just act for the greatest good and knowing that America would be on the sidelines until the election was one reason I was hoping for a miracle. I did not expect a statement from Gaga to coincide with that miracle, though that would make my ideas about magic more obvious, but I was actually expecting the miracle that saves Syria to coincide with something I wrote here, unread by all but a very few with little or no political influence - but the magical effect of having written down the expectation for a miracle - and it being the right thing to happen -has been my "plan" all along. All it has to do with Gaga, besides her being a greater symbol for liberation, is that she inspires me to try this kind of magic.
But I have been regretting not doing "my part", writing my magically-intentioned blog, while we basically waited for the election to be over. Now it almost is over and when Obama is re-elected so much energy that has been caught up in the campaign will be freed to do other things, and people who have been focused on trying to keep America moving forward will be able to help Syria and other countries more as well, both because they have the time and the flexibility to act without unjust scrutiny. As long as Romney does not win, looking back this election will give us fascinating insight into the nature of greed and lies and old power structures and salesmanship that Romney exemplifies. The only benefit of the right-wing that has distilled so much that is wrong in our culture is that it makes it easier to see how people can be duped and what kind of character flaws they want to promote and exploit, such as avarice mislabeled as "self-reliance." Of course the most flagrant example of how they oppose democracy itself is not merely their uncaring obstruction of Obama for the last four years but their obstructions to voting through passing laws that suppress voting to intimidating people to reducing early voting so that lines take hours to wait to vote, up to 7 hours in Florida. They simply can't claim to even believe in democracy if they elect these officials and lawmakers and promote this mentality that only their kind should be allowed to vote.
It is the same philosophy that Assad and the evil Syrian regime have, that only certain people should be able to make decisions for everyone else. It is the reason the Syrian people are fighting for democracy and the reason we should support them - but not jump to the violent solutions presented by right-wingers. There are more creative ways to influence history and Obama will be able to utilize them in his second term, for peace in Syria and all over the world. We are interconnected in so many ways and we all need each other. My ideas of magic are based on mystical connections but these apply to other connections as well and there is so much we don't understand that we can be fantastically surprised by what is possible if we try.
As I started writing this, hoping to push some magical button to end the crisis in Syria, re-elect Obama and legalize weed here in Colorado, and knowing there is a magical connection to all of these things and also to Gaga, I was pleased by links from a little monster in India about Gaga's statements and interviews urging us to vote for Obama, since I missed them when they came out, but was even more pleased by the progression of the news. As I started composing this in my head tonight (yes, they do sometimes have forethought!) the news was about a suicide bomber in Syria who killed 50 Syrian troops, the deadliest attack so far on Assad's forces. A victory of sorts for the rebels but not exactly what I call "good news", since I am a pacifist and mourn all loss of life. But the next story was of the council of rebels expanding to include more groups and having organizational meetings. This is democracy and the reason democracy is something we have to fight for, even revolt for, because the people who want to hold power exclusively, the people corrupted by power, will always have some form of force on their side. But the people, the truth, the Future, is where the true power is. As I wrote that sentence "Just Dance" just ended on the radio..... and as I went to start typing this gagablog there was breaking news: 7 generals defected from Syria into Turkey. That is the kind of news I'm excited to hear, as a pacifist, because that is the best way to end conflict, for the people in the worng to give it up. And it is the kind of news I am overjoyed to hear as a Gagaist witch, because it shows this magic is working. Maybe it is slow movement sometimes, or too subtle to notice, but it is always magical movement toward freedom when we honor and follow Gaga and the truth, love and freedom she shows.

I'm encouraged, magically, and know that we will re-elect Obama today with a large margin to give confidence and momentum to the agenda of peace, alternative fuels, honoring diversity and civil rights, and supporting democracy - both around the world and in here America where it is under attack. We are doing what is right, everything that is right, and it is all coming together. And we are doing in in many ways and can always add more. We all have so much magical potential, but we also need to vote. If we can stay true to our dreams and make them real in our actions, we will earn the Future that Gaga has shown us and Obama will help us reach. The difference between the Future and the past? Everyone will be included and cared for. I don't know why that idea is so scary to so many Americans, but we will start living together and enjoy it and be an exemplary part of a community of nations instead of a bully in the world and to our own people. Gaga has been working on it from that angle all along, because all evil is essentially bullying, from Assad's airstrikes on his own people to the Republican governor closing polls to keep people from voting. But the will of the people is true, it is built on our hopes and therefor is the Future calling to us, and we have the real power on our side despite the wordly powers for evil stacked against us - and we have the Champions of Obama and Gaga on our side. As the Indian little monster told me, we have the gay vote on our side so we can't lose - it's time for the Future! Obama-Biden 2012, Germanotta-Clinton 2016!!!

"Happy Birthday, Gaga! You are the Goddess, it's all You!" gagablog 43

Gaga, I love you so much, you are everything and all in one, the perfect Goddess to me and my best dreams and most fantastic imaginings come true!. When I say you are the Goddess I think of you as perfect love in action, song, and fashion. You are the pinnacle of Art, the Inspiration Point that shows us all the way. You overflow with caring and give so much to us, and lead us with bravery to live our own lives as bravely in our own ways. Thank you so much for sharing all your gifts with us, and for caring for the Ruby Slippers you recieved last year, as you are our Dorothy who brings us together out of the fields and forests and leads us on the Road to Love through the land our dreams make real.
What do I mean when I say "Gaga, you are the Goddess!"? Will Gaga ever see me say it? Maybe not, and yet I say it again and again. Who am I talking to? I'm talking to you, I'm talking to me, to all of us, when I say "Gaga, you are the Goddess." I think we are all part of the same love, we all share the same life and are all always both from and with The Goddess. The fact that Gaga is the perfect example, to me, of the Goddess as the world most needs her now, makes it easy for me to talk about the Goddess in Gaga terms. It can be difficult to explain, too, but only because we are so far away from understanding of the Goddess so I welcome any challenge or opportunity in discussing her.
Do you ever wonder if someone you meet on the internet is Gaga in disguise? Maybe it is just a fantasy that many people have, that they could be talking to Gaga, and I'm sure she does talk to her fans online, probably as herself but maybe with other personas to be annonymous, but I also imagine that some people impersonate her. The reason I bring it up is because I start to suspect it when I talk to people and they are really nice, even seem to be mystically nice. And I imagine that people impersonating her would be incredibly nice as well. Because all accounts I have heard of people who have met her attest to how nice and loving she is to her fans. She certainly sets the new standard for an artist who cares for and responds to her audience. I'm focusing on how she does this with her own interactions to show how, if we suspect someone of being Gaga, or if we know they are a little monster, we are as nice as we can possibly be. She has this effect of making the whole world nicer from her direct influence and from the millions of monsters who are influenced by her. On the other side of the spectrum, the main thing that makes monsters nice is the liberating and empowering message of Gaga's music allows us to be brave in being who we really are, Born This Way. But in the direct way, of interacting with Gaga or other monsters, imagining talking with her, or showing the world who we are - freakish, maybe, possibly a little scary at first, but nice and loving above and within all - in this way we are all like Gaga, little monsters who take after our Mommy.
I have not met Gaga or seen her show even yet, and I hope to soon. And I know from her music how liberating it is and how much it really helps us all be better in love. But I can also tell from people who have seen or met her that she has this same force of incredible Goodness in person, even more so. And I have my own experience of talking with some little monsters online who are so kind and wise and friendly, it makes me start to wonder sometimes..... My point is that when you start to treat people with this kind of love, that they "could be Gaga", when you start to look for the Gaga in everyone, it can put you, and everyone you come in contact with, at ease. This ease is what we need for love to grow in the world so that it fully replaces the rule of fear. As I wrote this "celebrate a new compassion" was the lyric going by, and as "Bad Kids" is playing now I think about how Gaga relates to all of us but especially the outsiders.
In this way Gaga's fabulous example helps us all feel good and be better to each other and if we really want to be like her of course that means being the best individuals we can be, but also seeing the goodness in everyone and coming together. I've been celebrating Gaga all day and I wanted to talk about how Gaga is like religious figures of the past, who show a glorious example and teach us to follow it and be like them in our own way, but right now "follow that unicorn on the Road to Love" is on and Gaga just says it much better. We are about to have a firepit and cook some hotdogs celebrating Gaga's birthday. I drew a picture of Gaga this morning and posted it to facebook and really appreciated the many monsters who liked it, it really encourages me to draw and paint more. I feel the love and feel like I am back in the world of art after spending too long on the fringes, and I just want to go on this journey with you all to the heart of it, on the Road to Love to the Emerald City.
Thank you Gaga, and Happy Birthday! You are the Present to us all, you inspire us and give us ourselves to share with each other. Thank you monsters, together we will turn this whole world into the Grandest Monster Ball ever. Paws Up and GAGA FOREVER!   

"Paws Up and Hoodies Up! Justice is Best Served by a Black Trans Am" gagablog 42

I've been watching Knight Rider - thanks, Netflix. This was one of my very favorite shows as a kid, so the nostalgia factor of finally seeing it again is wonderful. I can't even begin to describe the pleasure I get from the writing, acting, directing, plots, fashions, themes, and characters, but it is both the best TV I've ever seen in my life (next to the Simpsons) and some of the worst TV ever made and for some of the same reasons. A perfect balance like Yin and Yang, KITT and KARR, Michael and Garth, and it oozes the very essence of the 80's. Even thinking about watching it cracks me up and when I have someone else to watch it with who feels the same way it makes us buckle over wih laughter and astonishment. And while the hilarity and ridiculousness of Knight Rider is off the charts, there is something I still like even more about it, even more than it's brilliance and awfulness. It's what I think I always liked most about it. It's the way it captures that core idea of America that justice will be done for everyone.
Today, it has been a month since Trayvon Martin was killed with no arrest of the killer and there is a national debate about racial injustice in America. On the anniversary people are wearing hoodies in marches on the streets, in churches, and on TV, in solidarity with Trayvon and all who are killed in the continuation of unjust systems. Also today the arguments are being made before the Supreme Court about the Affordable Health Care Act ('Obamacare') that basically boil down to are we all in this together, the democrat view, or is it everyman for himself and forget the women, the republican view. It is a day when our government has paid the families of the civilians murdered by a soldier in Afghanistan, a day when Obama has angered Republican candidates by working with Russia who they want to call our #1 enemy, and a day when China has joined Russia in agreeing to work with the UN for peace in Syria. It's a day of Justice and it is the Eve of Lady Gaga's birthday. But today is a day in the balance, waiting for Justice. Tomorrow will be the first day of a new era where we will have more justice because at this moment of balance the scales will tip and we will choose the path of Truth. Because Truth will always win in the end, it is the greater power. We seek justice by loving the truth, knowing we will reveal it, and that it will become a new standard of justice. Worldwide, in Syria and in America, especially for black people, injustice is perpetuated by bullying people with violence and keeping them impoverished and disempowered politically. There have been so many murders to keep things unjust as well, maybe ten thousand in Syria recently and many more than that in the black community in America. Trayvon Martin is a symbol of this injustice and the response shows how many people relate to the fear of injustice and are ready to change it. People are raising each others' awareness about injustice and we will get to the truth and truly have justice if we really believe in it.
Belief is the key and everything about hoping for the best is the way to go, from seeking a just end to bullying, murder, war, and poverty, to helping our neighbors and families and strangers, re-electing Obama, and spreading awareness and assistance for issues worldwide. We need hope for this more than anything, hope that is even faith in the truth, our actions and abilities, and each other. The belief we need is that we can and will reach a world of justice for everyone by working together and focusing on it. The movie "The Hunger Games" is a huge success now. It just came out but could become the biggest hit of all time. There is a scene made for the movie to sum up the oppressor's perspective that I saw in a clip on TV. The idea is that a little hope is necessary to keep oppressed people going but too much can be fanned into a flame for revolution. I think the bullies and oppressive systems underestimate hope and the power of Truth - of course they don't realize truth will always win or they would not waste their lives in lies and cover-ups. We are seeing that when we have hope and really believe in it we can change things, we can change everything. The truth will win and the systems and people allied with it will prosper eventually, while those who hide it and oppress people will either change or lose their power. Systems based on injustice will fall, it is just a matter of how much hope we can gather together as to how long it will take.
Some might say I live in a fantasy world, that we will never have a world without war, injustice, poverty or even money. I say that by living in that world in my mind I can better make this world what it should be, a better world like the one in my dreams and fantasies. Gaga has said that she lives "halfway between fantasy and reality" and recently that "we need fantasy to survive because reality is too difficult". We're in both, and fantasy is better both because it is not "too difficult" and because it is required to make reality better. Of course reality is important too and fantasy shows us where our duty lies to improve reality. And we have to become aware of reality and share our opposition to injustice, we have to engage the real world with the hopes of our greatest fantasies and dreams. Knight Rider is a total fantasy, and is hilarious for being ridiculous in many ways but it is also sadly ironic for being so "American" in it's themes of justice and help for the powerless in the 1980's when in America there was terrible injustice, much of which continues today. But the dream is real, and the idea is that the most powerful car and the coolest driver will be on the good side of Truth and Justice - and this is true. The Truth is the most powerful and will win if we believe in it. Systems that deny that will fall. KITT's rival is KARR, the prototype that had the programming error of having self-preservation as it's top priority. KITT was improved with a top priortiy to protect life and this is the difference between good and evil. Looking out only for oneself, perpetuating injustice and hoping the truth will never come out, is evil, while helping each other and believing that Justice will be served and we can make it happen is good. Gaga has some badass black cars in her "Marry the Night" video. The inspiration for this song was when she felt defeated in persuing her dreams but faced and married her fears and became a total badass. We need to do that in America and in the world - look at the things we are scared of, knowing we are better than our fear and that truth and justice will win, and be bold enough to take the actions that are good - to help each other and understand each other and seek truth and justice together , and avoid the actions that are evil - to "defend ourselves" and deny each other and resort to lies and bullying and scaring people. Michael Knight knew he would always win and in the 80's we knew, watching him on TV, that Justice would eventually prevail. Now we see ourselves on TV and in social media and realize that we are the Knight Riders and have the power to change the world believing that "one man can make a difference."
But we have grown and can make the dream more real than in the 80's, too. Because we can really see ourselves globally now and can expect that not only will we make the right decisions for truth as individuals but we will hold our governments accountable to do so as well, locally, nationally, and globally. In this way I think we should expect to see government as a good thing and make it that was, as democracies. We should empower everyone to vote, raise awareness and use our collective good judgement for the greatest good. In this way, the government, like KITT, can never be too powerful, as long as it is always Good. And if it is bad, of course we will change it, because we will reach our dreams, we will make our fantasies come true, and we will "marry the night", face our fears and become whole with the things we denied or ignored until we all belong in a peaceful worldwide family. Today, like an episode of Knight Rider, all the goodness and evil in the world are in perfect balance, but it's time to tip for the Good.  The Age of Justice and Goodness begins tomorrow - Lady Gaga was, is, and will be Born This Day, and our world will be reborn with her, 3-28-12. Paws Up and Hoodies Up!!!  (''')     (^)

"The Solution to End War and Bullying: Disarm" gagablog 41

I've talked about the bullying by groups, society, corporations and states and how war, poverty, and suffering in general are all symptoms of the same problem of bullying. It's always people in a position of power hurting those who are less powerful, according to the given system, instead of helping them. It's always the same mentality whether it is cliques in school, greedy corporations and republicans, or nations that kill people, from Syria to the USA. To finally solve the problem I want to address it on the individual level. The traditional bully, like Nelson Muntz in the Simpsons, uses violence to feel superior to his peers. He does this as a last resort because he feels inferior in so many other ways. Poverty is a major cause of his isolation and he endures great suffering due to his lifestyle. He then takes this pain out on the other kids by hurting them physicaly and threatening and mocking them to hurt them emotionally. He takes power over his peers to make up for feeling powerless in life and he does it with violence. It would be admirable to turn those conditions into motivation to better himself or his home, to develop a talent that others would respect him for so that he could build community despite his disadvantages. Realizing that opportunity could be difficult, however, and while beating up other kids is not the "easy way" it makes them fear you, which is not the same as respect but if it seems like the closest the bully will get to respect or control he will take it. I use Nelson as an example to show how being bullied by society that condemns poverty instead of helping the poor realize opportunities creates individual bullies who hurt other kids. But it is a mentality we share and the Nelsons of the schoolyards are one version of bully while nations can be another. We are all part of this culture of bullying and can all put a stop to it - and we need to.
I think the most important part of the brief study of Nelson I've just done is the idea that violence is his last resort after feeling inferior in every other category. When the whole sad situation arises from being disadvantaged it is all the more important to remember that there is always another option. The whole idea of owning firearms for self-defense presumes and even creates the kill-or-be-killed mentality. I agree with Dr. Who that we don't need to carry weapons because we don't expect to use them, To think otherwise is acting savagely and continuing a savage mentality that we should have outgrown as a species long ago. But who can blame individuals who think this way when the nations we live in think and act like this? In the 2012 election season when republican challengers are trying to show how much more warmongering they are than Obama, war with Iran over their potential nuclear program seems more and more likely. When I hear that the American and Isreali governments are telling Iran they cannot have a nuclear weapon, when "we" have many nuclear weapons, I feel like a bully. For an analogy I think about a gunfighter in a showdown who already has a gun drawn on someone. What's the best way to avoid someone getting shot? If he says "throw down your gun" it might sound hostile and provoke a violent response - telling someone what to do from a position of power is bullying and can make the other person act on what they think is a last resort by being put in that position, being disadvantaged. He could say "you don't need that gun" which is ultimately the truth if no one really wants to get shot. If the only reason to carry a gun is as a deterrent then all you need to know is that the other person is not going to use theirs, either as a bully or a crazy person. If both parties can agree that they don't really need a gun they can get rid of them. But even telling someone they don't need a gun, while holding a gun, could be unclear, confusing, or even seem untrue. The best way for the gunfighter to communicate that the other person does not need his gun is to throw down his own gun. It may be a brave thing to do but it really isn't that risky, it just presumes that people aren't crazy and don't want to kill each other, and it sends the clear, important message that "I don't want to kill you." Building on that presumption is what lets us feel more civilized but we still have weapons. As nations an individuals we should trust each other and find more ways to relate so we never feel like we need weapons. We can break the cycle of fear and violence by building on goodwill and trust between each other so that we can get rid of all weapons and all the fear that goes with them..
I think we should expect this of our own governments and change our military industries to more beneficial ends just as the energy companies that will survive will be the ones that leave oil and coal and nuclear and transform to harnessing renewable energy. I'm heartened by the fact that Russia has called for a cease-fire in Syria and was encouraged by the call from American legislators to halt arms purchases from the Russian company that is supplying Syria with arms. This was a step towards the idea that we should seek non-violent solutions, that military is not necessary - but just a small step. I hope the various forms of pressure will be enough to halt the violence in Syria but the solution may ultimately come from within as the people have often insisted. I think the nonviolent solution they will find will be surprising but will also be the model for how we all adress conflcit in the future and become the standard, mainly because it will come from a commitment to finding a peaceful solution which will be the expectation in the coming age. And it may come from rising awareness withing Syria of the crimes going on so that people abandon Assad's regime. I wanted to write this a few weeks ago when the news was of a prominent businessman defecting from Assad and encouraging others to follow. The emptying of support for a murderous regime will cause it to collapse and even though it has not happened yet it may come soon and that man will have set the example. But it may also take the influence of other countries to enforce a cease-fire. The one year anniversary of the protests there was just the other day and while such events can gather energy I think it is a magical principle that the most powerful changes come from something subtle within that and not at the expected time, but maybe made possible by that collection of energy around a milestone. I can only assume that when the extent and details of the terrible things the regime has done there are made known to the world the response will end the bullying regime, and it may rely on people's decisions inside Syria but could be provoked by stronger outrage from outside.
It may in fact be a matter of currency and whether enough flows in to support the bully. In this way it reminds me of the outcry when Rush Limbaugh called that lady bad names, bullying her as he is always bullying people with his immense radio power. But the response from the public and effect on advertisers may take that power away and rightfully so, even though some predict he is "too big" for this to happen. I think that on the contrary it will be an example to people of how they can end bullying with their choices of how they spend their money. Buying from companies who support things you  believe in will ultimately allow the better ones to thrive and do the most good in the world. Becoming aware of which companies support bullies and war will drive them out of business and their influence out of society. They didn't think Limbaugh would ever fall but when he does it will be an example to people of what their conscience and decisions can achieve.
In our own lives we can only try to take care of people and prevent bullying and the conditions that lead to it. If we could understand that the crazy people who shoot other people need to be cured before they kill and that they are symptoms of sickness in a society that we are all part of, when we take responsibilty to take care of each other, then we won't blame the lone crazy killer in the sense that we want to kill him. We won't focus on who to blame and shoot because it won't go that far, because instead we will focus on identifying who needs help and what he needs to feel he has another option, to be a part of society again. We have to be able to change society to take responsibility for everyone in it. I'm thinking of the soldier who so horrifically abused his power and access to weapons and killed all those civilians in Afghanistan. Now they are talking about the factors that led to him doing this and I hope they can prevent similar things, though the sad truth is that similar things have been happening and the nature of the conflict is like being  a bullying aggressor. If we are a more advanced country we should be that much better at finding a peaceful solution. If we could always be looking for ways to creatively address the problems that lead to bullying and violence we can stop it and stop feeling like we need to fear one another. We can do this as nations, in our own communities small and large, and in our daily interactions. It's only by opposing bullying in all its forms, at all levels, that we can end it but when we do have that focus we can end it forever.  All it takes is accepting that we are all better than that and deciding that we won't consider violence an option anymore. When we act in this way and care for each other we will lift ourselves out of the lives where we feel the stress to be violent or where anyone is so disadvantaged, or that some people are so empowered, that they feel that violence is the solution to their problems.

Gagafesto "END BULLYING NOW (Repeat after Gaga)" gagablog 40

When Gaga met President Obama to propose a new campaign to end bullying I wrote gagablog 36 to point out how bullying was also the problem with the Syrian government, and others, using the military to bully their people, and the Greedy 1% using corporate lobbyists and devisive big-money politics to bully the 99% with unfair policies that exploit us and SuperPACs that disenfranchise us. Yesterday a boy who had been bullied for years in school shot 5 other kids in Ohio and I want to address the "typical" kind of bullying we are all aware of but we certainly are not doing enough to end.
I'm not blaming the bullies for the killings because we are all responsible for our actions and there is no excuse for killing people. There is also no excuse for bullying and it is logical that if this boy had not been bullied then he would not have killed his peers. So the bullies, and our culture of bullying, are partly to blame for these deaths and also for what they did to this boy in the first place whether he did something worse or not. If he had not killed anyone or acted out at all - or if he had killed himself as too many who are bullied do - the bullies are to blame for what they did to him and should feel responsible.
I noticed some things in the news coverage of this tragedy that compelled me to make this point. One was an interview with one of the boys who had been shot but was grazed by the bullet. It is already well-established that the killer, T. J., had been bullied for years. When giving a description of the boy, the shooting victim said things like he "used to be one of us" and that he had become withdrawn or isolated himself in the last few years. Maybe he did isolate himself but I am sure he did not say "I'll be over here if anyone wants to bully me." He did not invite bullying and surely it contributed to his isolation. There may be other factors but from what has come out so far it seems certain that the bullying was a major motivation for these murders. The victim who made these comments might not have been a bully but was aware that T. J. was bullied and I believe the way he said that T.J. had isolated himself was a means of absolving the bullies from their role and blame in this whole situation. I'm sure kids at that school feel guilty for bullying him now, in a way, and I only wish that they would have felt guilty about it before and stopped. This is why we need to focus on this issue because only awareness and conscious change will make "school shootings" go away. And the way to do it is to change the culture that allows this to happen and to say at every occasion how bullying is wrong but also to do the opposite of bullying and encourage and include people because it is the lack of supprt and acceptance that makes kids, and adults, despair and take desperate or vengeful action.
A lady who was interviewed on CNN, who wrote a book about bullying, said that we need to change the culture and the news anchor responded that that was too big a task so what can we do now. While reactive solutions might make lots of money for metal detector companies, security firms, or more Big Brothers on the internet, they aren't going to solve the problem because they won't stop the bullying. Schools breed despair and stress in our culture and while a natural response to seeing someone in distress is to sympathize, when there is way too much stress and cliques and isolation in play as we have in our schools people don't try to help each other, seeing the despair as something to alleviate, but too often just try to manage it by making someone else feel more despair than they do and at least feel superior to someone in a system that makes everyone feel pretty bad. We have to change this, in our schools and in society at large. We need a culture in which we support and incude each other.
I'm not trying to blame the media for this tragedy either but it is important to recognize how they not only reflect some of our bullying culture but continue it with assumptions like this one that it is too pervasive to change. One thing that upset me in the coverage of this is when a newscaster said it was "ironic" that families moved to this area to "get away from this kind of thing". To me, this idea that we can "get away" from certain people and if we don't have to see them we don't have to care is the heart of the problem. The worst bullies are still the governments that can kill the opposition but every bully acts out of some sort of powerful position. Therefore it is the duty of the powerful to make sure they do not bully anyone, even unintentionally. And indeed it is the duty of everyone to pay attention to each other and help each other out. It is only due to an overabundance of despair that we retreat from larger community and want to only take care of "our own." The only way to overcome despair is to work together, since the despair itself is the result of our divisions. The more people and varieties of people we consider "our own" and can work with the more we can overcome. It's the "us and them" mentality that is the problem, exclusion is the problem. We shouldn't say "God Bless America" we should say "Goddess Bless the World". We can't even save ourselves, humans, if we don't want to save the whole planet and all life on it. We should seek benefit for all, at no one's expense and we can have this but we must first believe that we can then oppose the forces that would hold us back.
One newscaster suggested their was a problem with having the "troubled school" kids change busses with the "regular school kids". More separation is not the solution, it is the problem. If the kids in this "idyllic" community had been exposed to more diversity they might not have felt guilty for seeing someone worse off then they and decided to bully him to justify why their lives seemed better, trying to make it like he deserved pain by heaping more on. This is the heart of our culture of bullying, the idea that if something makes me feel bad the solution is to make you feel worse. We have great wealth in America yet instead of great altruism many rich people resent the poor and just want to keep them poor and out of mind. It is because they feel guilty for having so much more and they should, and should do something about it. We always try to focus on what is wrong with the "bad kid" like it is all his fault. It isn't only the bullies who share the blame or the media for perpetuating this paradigm. We are all part of a culture that accepts bullying in many forms and focuses on division instead of common good. It is all connected to bullying by the wealthy and by abusive government and the question goes both ways: if we can't teach kids to stop bullying in schools, how can we get governments to stop bullying? And if we can't set an example by ending bullying as a nation, as a culture, or in whatver groups we belong, how can we be an example to kids? We have to oppose bullying in all its forms, from kids who feel despair and seek to control it by weilding it over others instead of alleviating it, to politicians and their mobs who believe education is only for those who can afford it, like Rick Santorum says, since they believe in a vengeful God who punishes people by making them poor, the same argument that the bullied kid deserves it because he is worse off to start with. We have to see ourselves as part of a larger group and take the "outsiders" into account. This is why I love Gaga's song "Bad Kids" so much because takes the perpective of the "bad kid" and points out that we are products of our environments but our hearts are naturally good and therefore there is good in everyone and the way to be the best is to recognize everyone's essential goodness and honor it. If we do that, we won't be able to bully other kids anymore, we will care about them. And we won't be able to bully other countries anymore if we remember that people are really good.
We have to evolve past this fear of each other that leads people to think they need guns in the first place. The same mentality that makes an individual think he needs a gun is what makes us think we need the strongest and most weapons as a country. The way to avoid getting shot is not to have the biggest gun, it is to remove people's fears that make them want guns at all. The greedy rich and their right-wing political stooges traffic in arms and fear and we need to put them out of business entirely in both markets. In the future we will have no fearmongering, warmongering or arms dealing. The people who like that sort of thing can play the video game versions where the only casualties are ego. But we have to get there, to the future, and the only way to go is all together.
When the "Born this Way" video came out and the Arab Spring was flowering in bloody and liberating blooms, I think I misinterpretted a message Gaga gives in the intro about protecting her monsters, protecting the outkasts and oppressed. At the time I was considering this idea that in some cases force is necessary to oppose evil. But when I think about it now I am reminded of the line from "The Queen" where she says "I don't need these 14 karat guns to win I'm a woman I insist it's my right". In a way, between the images of her with the machine guns at the start of Born This Way and the idea of her Golden Gun, I missed the more direct point that she really Does. Not. Need. Guns. None of us do. Instead, we all have the right to our lives and we should all insist on those rights being respected, especially where there is a lack of respect for women or minorities or the "poor masses" - but no matter what groups we identify with we should all be working toward a culture of respect.
I want to apply this principle to my magical intention for Syria now. I have decided that when the choice is supposedly between a diplomatic solution and a military one, the answer will be both non-military and undiplomatic. By which I mean, there is no reason to respect a bullying regime, to treat them diplomatically in the general sense - it is time to shame and humilate them. And there is no reason to kill them, just as T. J. did not have to kill anyone in reaction to bullying. In fact, bringing greater military might to end the situation only perpetuates the bullying culture that the biggest weapon is right and whoever is willing to kill the most people gets to decide what happens. I expect that some strange occurances will take place that end this conflict in a very surprising way. I really think that we can learn a much needed lesson about bullying from this latest "school shooting" and also from how our elections are being bought and how the Syria government is killing its people and our helplessness to stop it. If we address all of these issues with the same lens, that bullying is wrong and must be stopped in all its forms, including the ones we are part of such as the great american military, we can grow out of the culture of bullying and division to one of support and unity.
Thanks Gaga for the infinite ways you inspire us but also for the focus you have brought to this issue. We are gonna win this one and end the bullying game. You set us up perfectly for it and give hope to the outkasts to find acceptance and make changes with our voices and art, not bullets.  

"Happy Birthday, Gagablog!: Expanding Time", gagablog 39

Gossip Girl's final scene last night was of Blair and Louie getting into a car with the paparazzi cameras flashing at them. I guess they used a classic cinematic trick of slowing the background so that they were like the only two people and it really worked, it really gave me that feeling like I was there in that timeless moment. Maybe it was because I have seen this camera trick before and it reminded me of so many similar scenes, but this was even more pronounced - not just because of the emotion of the scene, though I am sure Blair's discomfort was a factor in the impression. Maybe they slowed down the background a lot more than people usually do in these scenes: the camera flashes were like stars or bright white crosses that just stayed there, still, while she slowly looked around. It made me feel what Blair felt in that moment and it felt mystical - the feeling of a moment lasting forever. I want to give credit to Gossip Girl for fashioning this scene so well but Gaga is the one who first presented this mystical idea in the perfect way for me. I've been meaning to write about this for years and assumed I would cover it in a detailed exposition of Paparazzi, the song that most perfectly reveals it, though the idea is in her other lyrics as well. It really is the key that got me thinking of Gaga in religious terms so I have a lot to say about it but I will try a condensed version here. When I saw the Gosspi Girl scene - when I and millions of others "became Blair" for a moment - it reminded me of Paparazzi and I had this idea: Identity is like a two-way mirror between us. We can see both of us in it, "You and I", and we can choose sides to identify with, but we are both in it together and it is something we share. Paparazzi's lyrics are so genius that I was sold on Gaga's divinity the first time I heard them. The chorus, "I'm your biggest fan I'll follow you until you love me" is a glorious two-way mirror: she could be singing from the perspective of the paparazzi, or from the perspective of the star. The sublime stutter, "Papa - paparazzi" inplies the quest and craving for fatherly/missing acceptance. The context, with some sort of Brittany melt-down in the headlines, marrying one dude briefly without hollywood approval then dating a paparazzi, and Gaga's performance at the MTV awards and the spectacle of the sacrificed star, put this quest for acceptace at the heart of The Fame. For me, there was always something perfect about the way she was both sides of the "star/lover-fan", seeking the love of the crowd or the attention of the star, either as a paparazzi seeking a good shot or as a groupie/girlfriend waiting backstage. She works multiple sides of the mirror of identity in Paparazzi and reveals a deep mystical reality in the flow of identity and attention.
Being swarmed by paparazzi is part of being famous. Some celebrities complain about it. Gaga not only embraced it but made it an art form in itself like everything she does. She said she sought to master the Art of Fame and by doing so she is a master of awareness and attention and Time. These are things we talk about but have limited understanding of. Since Gaga has a deeper understanding and is truly making the most of awareness and attention she gets the full effect of every situation. She respects the paparazzi and the attention they bring and makes the most of it - one direction for the lyrics of Paparazzi to go is that she will follow the cameras until they love her. She has described her wonderful fashions as a way of honoring those photographer's work and respecting the attenion of millions that they represent. By showing and giving this love in everything she does and wears, as she shows love in her music and messages to her fans, she is getting mroe and more love back. Its like she found the secret and is using it and showing others how to use it, too. Like she is saying "I am Love (and so can you!)". To me this secret, exemplified in the "frozen moment" when the star is surrounded by paparazzi, tells us something mahical about time and is one of the best ways to talk about it since we mostly only take time for granted and don't really get it.
The moment the paparazzi are immortalizing is depicted, in movies and TV, as seeming to last forecer for the star at the center of it. This is one irony of the "Who's who of you and I": it actually feels like expanded time to the star, but the moment will truly be immortal in a different way to the audience. People could look at pictures of that instant for years, for millions of years. It may be that when we understand spiritual physics we can determine that the star senses all the time that others will spend looking at images of the moment and that is part of how time slows down or expands for them when the moment is happening. This presumes a "connection" to all things, including future things, that I believe in but people don't talk too much about. I think talking about it is the key to magic, and I think what we are talking about - awareness, attention, and Time - is the heart of magic so everything can be explained through it. All ambition is a quest for immortality in a way, and all great innovators achieve it but there is something special about the quality in the entertainment world. There is something special about The Fame and Gaga reveals how it works with everything she does - she is surely the greatest Master of Fame in history. One function of the Fame is expanding time - that what she wears one day will be looked at for years, that anytime she is out in public there are images of her from every angle at every split-second. One of her songs, a few minutes in itself, has been heard and seen for centuries when all the attention is added up, even if it is only a year old. I am sure that Gaga will join many other musicians whose music is heard by people centuries and milinnea into the future and i think her impact in other ways will ensure she is always viewed as an important figure. Whether she is commonly recognized as a Goddess or not I htink she has already achieved immortality and will only get "more immortal" as time goes on.
This is all based on an idea that there is more Time within Time than we can experience when we barely notice it. We usually count time and basically observe it from an "outside" perspective. I was trying to find a secret mental route to sleep, taking a nap before Gossip Girl xame on, and realized that a obvious quality of sleep and dreams is "dream-time" which is not a different order of time like Nintendo seconds used to go by fatser than clock seconds, it is like an inversion of Time itself. Or rather, our limited understanding of time is because we have it inside out and are stuck in it, but when we dream, and probably when we die for a while, we are really in Time, inside of it not obseving, part of it, one with it, so that we feel Timeless. The people down under, in Oz, have mapped dreamtime and know what Time really is, from within it. Countless works of art from the rest fo the world allude to timeless moments. These are moments that surely correspond to a calendar and clock-time in which they "occured" but they are escapes from the Tyrant of Clock-time into the Timlessness of Dreamtime. Dr. Oz told us that American society is starved for good nutrition but we are equally starving for sex and sleep. I think all these issues - and every issue in the world by extension - have a skeleton-key solution and Gaga is giving it to us. Be fabulous, be divine, be your true self. The very path of following your dreams for The Fame, or for Love ("do you want love or you want fame are you in the game?" - Lovegame) makes more of the path for yourself and for others.
Together we are expanding time, iimmortalizing moments and discovering who we really are by admiring and playing with each other. This is the first birthday of the Gagablog, which I started as a birthday present to myself. It looks like I share a birthday with Charles Dickens, who turns 200 hundred today. And people thought he was long-winded, wait till they get a load of me.... and I hope I will have as good a reputation as a champion of the poor, 200 years from now, though I hope poverty will be a relic of the past then. I was born an Aquarius and a Dragon (and a planetary white dog according to my once-neighbor's reading of the Myan horoscope)  and this is the Age of Aquarius and the luckiest year again, the Year of the Dragon. so I'm anticipating great things and being a part of them this year. This Gagablog has documented some amazing events and changes in the world this last year, from revolutions to the release of Born This Way and singles and videos from it. I think this year will be even more phenomenal, and while Gaga had expanded 2011 into decades or centuries, 2012 will be a millinium in itself. I plan to add more of my creative efforts and together with Gaga, and everyone, we will make a wonderful new world. It is always this moment, now, from which we can slip into something more comfortable - infinity.   (''')